Tuesday night "attempted" smack down by the "axis of taxes," Foote, Pickel, Duncan, Beasley and Robinson (Audio is up-click here !)
What a magnificent showing by our own tax and spend crew, none other than Foote, Pickel, Duncan Beasley, and "Der Fuhrer" (Robinson) (the axis of tax's.) During the meeting the Prop "S" tax was brought up by Alderman Miguel who gave three ideas as to how to remove this tax as the loan is paid off. Mr. Foot did his darnedest to postpone the vote on this so as to not be forced to show us what he really thinks before election day. When that didn't work he tried to spin it to benefit his line, and I don't believe that worked either.
So then we have the vote where MR. FOOTE VOTED TO CONTINUE THE TAX UNTIL THE GENERAL FUND IS PAID BACK (for a loan that never happened.) Who do we see right in perfect formation with him ? Why Pickel, Duncan and Beasley, (Ms. Beasley will you ever do anything with out asking Mr. Foote first?) I am beginning to think your way out of your depth here, no? while I am at it look at the SunCrest Call, March 26, 2009 where Pickel and Duncan both said they would vote it out (Mr. Foote made No such statement at all, he just voted for it as did they. Now that said my question is were they telling the truth then, but forgot it, or have they banded with Der Fuhrer to give him all he wants and are trying to run from their statements in the Call of 3/26/2009, either way it's a prevarication of the first order and should not be tolerated by their constituents !
Another interesting debate was on Animal control when Mr. Pickel (who did not have his light on) TOOK THE FLOOR FROM ALDERMAN DUCHILD (who had his light on, to table the vote on animal control until April 13th, 2010 (after the election don't ya know) with the full blessing of Der Fuhrer who said it was his meeting and he would recognize whom he pleases, light or no light ! Once again we have Der Fuhrer (the Mayor deciding what's right and what's wrong all by himself, pathetic to say the least.
I promise you the audio will be on this post very soon as it has been requested via FOIA form, and if I were them I really wouldn't try to hold it up. I firmly believe once you hear the "Axis's of tax's" in their own voices just trying to run roughshod on US, their constituents you too will be a bit miffed ! I only hope your "miffed" enough to vote them out of office (the one we can,) and call and write these so called Representatives of the people and tell them what you think !Folks, it's OUR money they are playing with, not their's, so give them what for ! And when your done with that thank the following Aldermen for the good job they are doing to put a leash on these tax and spend "progressives."
Duchild,
Schlink
Miguel
Wallach
(The audio of Prop-s discussion part one is up now, please click the header.)
Tom Ford
NO. 734
So then we have the vote where MR. FOOTE VOTED TO CONTINUE THE TAX UNTIL THE GENERAL FUND IS PAID BACK (for a loan that never happened.) Who do we see right in perfect formation with him ? Why Pickel, Duncan and Beasley, (Ms. Beasley will you ever do anything with out asking Mr. Foote first?) I am beginning to think your way out of your depth here, no? while I am at it look at the SunCrest Call, March 26, 2009 where Pickel and Duncan both said they would vote it out (Mr. Foote made No such statement at all, he just voted for it as did they. Now that said my question is were they telling the truth then, but forgot it, or have they banded with Der Fuhrer to give him all he wants and are trying to run from their statements in the Call of 3/26/2009, either way it's a prevarication of the first order and should not be tolerated by their constituents !
Another interesting debate was on Animal control when Mr. Pickel (who did not have his light on) TOOK THE FLOOR FROM ALDERMAN DUCHILD (who had his light on, to table the vote on animal control until April 13th, 2010 (after the election don't ya know) with the full blessing of Der Fuhrer who said it was his meeting and he would recognize whom he pleases, light or no light ! Once again we have Der Fuhrer (the Mayor deciding what's right and what's wrong all by himself, pathetic to say the least.
I promise you the audio will be on this post very soon as it has been requested via FOIA form, and if I were them I really wouldn't try to hold it up. I firmly believe once you hear the "Axis's of tax's" in their own voices just trying to run roughshod on US, their constituents you too will be a bit miffed ! I only hope your "miffed" enough to vote them out of office (the one we can,) and call and write these so called Representatives of the people and tell them what you think !Folks, it's OUR money they are playing with, not their's, so give them what for ! And when your done with that thank the following Aldermen for the good job they are doing to put a leash on these tax and spend "progressives."
Duchild,
Schlink
Miguel
Wallach
(The audio of Prop-s discussion part one is up now, please click the header.)
Tom Ford
NO. 734
posted by Crestwood Independent at 16:25
8 Comments:
The mayor is a fully blown bully with little man complex!
It's all about the vote.
The mayor is a full blown bully with a little man complex!
I wonder if he likes to tickle other men into submission to get his way?
NO, he just makes promises to the unqualified.
yes, and referring to the mayor with hints of Nazi Germany is sooo much better, isn't it? The truth is, the dislike of the mayor is so prevalent here because people always attack traits they see in others that they don't like in themselves. This blog is all about doing it your way, so seeing someone else with that same mindset is threatening. To use your own word: Pathetic.
Hints of NAZI Germany? Where did you retrieve that impression from?
You're kidding, right? "der fuhrer"? direct references to Adolf Hitler.
DER FUHRER is German for the leader. Hitler was a leader, Obama is a leader, Robinson is a leader. What is the problem?
10:51 AM blogger: I take it you have little grasp of history, or Germany before the war ?
The term "Der Fuhrer" is not at all derogatory, but rather means "The Leader." As a student of history I see many parallel courses here, such as:
Both men reunited their people when first elected.
Both men were revered as the Saviour of their respective areas.
Both men began to believe they were superior, and acted as such.
Both men lost the respect of their constituents, surly for completely different reasons, but they lost it non the less.
Mayor Robinson (in my opinion, outside of politics) a very nice person who I would (and have) have a beer with any time.
I do however separate the Man, and the Politician, in that I do not in the least bit agree with or approve of the manor in which he runs meetings, or his attempt to do it his way or else.
There now does that help you understand that in no way is the term "Der Fuhrer" disrespectful, or any reference to "Nazi Germany ?"
Tom Ford
Post a Comment
<< Home