Monday, April 30, 2012

Who really is Mitt Romney, or the other Mitt Romney.

Some here have stated that they are not fans of Mitt Romney, but do we really know him? This was posted on the Second Amendment forum yesterday and has two pages of responses, all positive. The OTHER Mitt Romney. . . . I am a Southern Baptist, something that is not particularly compatible with Mormonism. Having said that, I happened upon the following today and thought it was interesting. Draw your own conclusions. What Do You Know About Mormons? A few years back, a hive of hornets decided to make its nest on top of a second-story swamp cooler outside my cousin's Boston-area home. My cousin made an ill-fated attempt to remove the hornets, which resulted in a two-story fall and a broken arm. This looks like a job for your home teacher, said my cousin's home teacher. The home teacher brought over his own ladder and clothed himself in homemade beekeeping gear. He then made his way to the hornet's nest and gathered the whole thing up in a garbage bag, avoiding any stings or the more severe injuries that had beset my cousin. He did this with no public fanfare, no accolades and no thought of collecting payment for his efforts and who was this noble home teacher ? A man by the name of .....................Mitt Romney. Now, unless you're familiar with Mormon lingo, you probably got lost when I introduced the phrase home teacher or you may have conjured up images of some kind of private educational tutor who was taking care of my cousin's kids. That would have left you wondering why a tutor thought it was their responsibility to wrangle hornets. But if you're a Mormon, the phrase made perfect sense, as did the rest of the story. You would know that every month, every member of a Mormon congregation receives a visit from two home teachers, who share an inspirational message but, more importantly, are charged with the responsibility of looking out for the family's welfare, so if a family is struggling, the home teachers are the spiritual first responders and a good home teacher jumps at any opportunity to be of service. Among other things, Mitt Romney is a good home teacher. People who look to Mitt's faith for clues about how he'd govern as President usually miss the target by a wide margin. They rip the more obscure elements of Mormon doctrine out of their theological and historical contexts polygamy or underwear or planetary real estate and think they've discovered or explained something. They haven't. The world at large, as it focuses on unusual theoretical elements of Mormon doctrine, all but ignores the eminently practical aspects of Mormonism as it is manifest in each Mormon's daily life. Consider the fact that home teachers receive no compensation for what they do. In fact, neither does anyone else in a Mormon congregation. The whole enterprise is supervised by a lay clergy that will often work over forty hours a week in their unpaid positions in addition to their jobs you know, the ones that actually earn them money. Mitt Romney has spent his entire adult life in these kinds of high-responsibility, time-intensive positions. He has been both a bishop a leader of a ward that consists of a congregation of about 500 people and a stake president, who oversees a stake which consist of about six or more wards, giving him ecclesiastical responsibility for thousands of people. So what does this mean ? What, precisely, does a bishop or a stake president do that eats up so much of their time? Go to a Mormon meeting on any given Sunday, and you'll see three dudes sitting up by the pulpit. The guy in the middle is the bishop, and he's already spent most of the day in meetings where he reviewed the ward's staffing needs and organized relief efforts for families who may be struggling with health, financial, or spiritual issues. He's also been meetings one-on-one with members of the church who look to him for counsel and support for personal problems that would turn your hair white. Usually, he's been doing all this since before the sun came up, so don't be surprised if he nods off while the meeting progresses. Please keep in mind, too, that there are no elections for bishops and stake presidents, nor are there reelections. Each leader is called to serve, and they accept the responsibility dutifully, no questions asked. They then serve for a period of time, usually between five and ten years, after which they are released, meaning they rejoin their congregations as lay members and have no more responsibility than anyone else. The call to serve can come to any priesthood holder in good standing, but it usually comes to a certain personality type. Remember, bishops and stake presidents are confronted with massive organizational challenges accompanied by the most intimate, personal, spiritual struggles imaginable. So they must lead without being authoritarian; they must judge without being judgmental and they must minister without offending. That means the people who get this assignment are often more even-tempered than exciting, more reassuring than revolutionary and more competent than colorful. Sound like any particular Presidential Candidate you might know ? Those who remain baffled by Romney's cool public persona have not spent a whole lot of time with an LDS stake president, a role for which Romney provides the quintessential example. If one truly understands his background, one shouldn't expect a President Romney to dazzle the masses with rhetorical virtuosity. The writer is unknown, but I that him or her for the insight. Tom Ford NO. 1019

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I do not have the least bit of concern for Mr. Romney's religion. I have huge issues with his massive flip flopping and his constant changing stances depending on who his audience is. Is the fact that he is a Mormon being spoken about as a problem for him? That seems pretty silly.

9:18 PM, April 30, 2012  
Blogger Crestwood Independent said...

"And in this corner the opposition for the next four years," I choose to error on the side of America!

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/apr/30/new-obama-slogan-has-long-ties
-marxism-socialism/

By the way, this is not just an error, he knows what it means, trust me.

Tom Ford

6:12 AM, May 01, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

looked at the article. It reminds me of slightly off center people who store guns and grenades on a compund in Minnesota because the "govmit" is coming to get them any day. You have seemed too level headed to buy into that "the sky is falling", Henny Penny nonsense, Mr. Ford. I guess I read you wrong. i would have thought that a rational man such as yourself would see clearly that the use of a single word does not make one anything...socialist, marxist, or anything else. but then again, if you're actauuly looking for those things, hoping to see them....I guess even pink elephants floating around would materialze under enough scrutiny and wishing.

7:20 AM, May 01, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"he knowa what it means, trust me." I am to trust you based on your intense personal knowledge of the president, or your ability to read minds from afar?

12:43 PM, May 01, 2012  
Blogger Crestwood Independent said...

7:20 AM Blogger: Not the "word" that bothers me, it's the deed's. As the Bible says, "by their deed's shall you know them."

A word in this case is a label, nothing more, nothing less, but what the man does and who he associates with tells me he is a devout socialist who has an agenda counter to the United States Constitution.

God knows I am not, nor have I ever "looked" for that type of leader in my 70+ years as an American Citizen.

I really do believe we are on a path orchestrated by progressive / liberals,and he is but the puppet we see on stage. The real decision makers are ALL behind the curtain, and they are anything by American Constitutionalists.

Sorry but I was once a young sailor who fought for this Republic, and I will not disavow my oath to protect it "from all enemies, foreign of domestic," no matter what, or who were discussing.

Tom Ford

5:08 PM, May 01, 2012  
Blogger Crestwood Independent said...

12;43 PM Blogger: SEE ABOVE! DEED'S, DEED'S, DEED'S, get it?

Tom Ford

5:09 PM, May 01, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

well, your opinion is your own, and I respect it. I think you are way off, but that is neither here nor there. I do still believe that all the insanity, the paranoid frenzy over SOCIALISM(menacing music) has caused many to see it where it doesn't exist. I know well what mob mentality can do...can we think back to Joe McCarthy? I see the same thing here. Freaking out over a phantom, manufactured "crisis" that never was a threat of any kind.

5:52 PM, May 01, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I understand your desire to make Romney more appealing and palatable. As the Republican nominee, he's the pill the GOP will have to swallow. I don't care for him either.

9:13 PM, May 02, 2012  

Post a Comment

<< Home

>